.com - Commercial
.edu - Educational institution
.org - Organization or association
.gov - Government website
.ca - Canadian website
.uk - United Kingdom website
~ - Personal website
Steps and Guidelines for effectively evaluating websites. (From UC-Berkeley)
"...[O]nce we come up with a hypothesis to test, most of us embrace it too strongly. As a result, we don't read sources as objectively as we should. When you seek to support a particular answer, you quickly spot data and arguments that confirm it, but you'll be tempted to overlook or reinterpret data that contradict or even just qualify it. And when the data are ambiguous, you'll be tempted to resolve ambiguities in your favor.
You have to guard against those biases, both in your own work and in your sources."
(Booth, Colomb & Williams, The Craft of Research, 2003, p. 91)
Currency: The timeliness of the information. |
• When was the information published or posted? • Has the information been revised or
updated? • Is the information current or out-of
date for your topic? §Are the
links functional? |
Relevance: The importance of the information for your needs. |
• Does the information relate to your
topic or answer your question? • Who is the intended audience? • Is the information at an appropriate
level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? • Have you looked at a variety of sources
before determining this is one you will use? • Would you be comfortable using this
source for a research paper? |
Authority: The source of the information. |
• Who is the
author/publisher/source/sponsor? • Are the author's credentials or
organizational affiliations given? • What are the author's credentials or organizational
affiliations given? • What are the author's qualifications to
write on the topic? • Is there contact information, such as a
publisher or e-mail address? §Does
the URL reveal anything about the author or source? examples: .com .edu .gov
.org .net |
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the
informational content. |
• Where does the information come from? • Is the information supported by
evidence? • Has the information been reviewed or
refereed? • Can you verify any of the information in
another source or from personal knowledge? • Does the language or tone seem unbiased
and free of emotion? • Are there spelling, grammar, or other typographical
errors? |
Purpose: The
reason the information exists. |
• What is the purpose of the information?
to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? • Do the authors/sponsors make their
intentions or purpose clear? • Is the information fact? opinion?
propaganda? • Does the point of view appear objective
and impartial? • Are there political, ideological,
cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? |
9/29/09. Meriam Library, California State University, Chico http://www.csuchico.edu/lins/handouts/eval_websites.pdf